<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techandsoc.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techandsoc.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techandsoc.com</link>
	<description>Just another CommonGroundPublishing weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yentabytes and Shiksabytes</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/07/yentabytes-and-shiksabytes/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/07/yentabytes-and-shiksabytes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>audreyl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.com/?p=1646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From David Friend at Vanity Fair
“One petabyte is equivalent to million gigabytes. A zettabyte is a million petabytes. A yottabyte is a thousand zettabytes.”
—The New York Times, March 2, 2010
Linguists who study changes in Internet-related terminology have discovered an increasing use of ever-more-bizarre and sometimes Yiddish-sounding phrases when it comes to characterizing large quantities of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From David Friend at <em>Vanity Fair</em></p>
<p>“One petabyte is equivalent to million gigabytes. A zettabyte is a million petabytes. A yottabyte is a thousand zettabytes.”<br />
—<em>The New York Times,</em> March 2, 2010<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1647" title="david_friend" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/03/david_friend.jpg" alt="david_friend" width="112" height="235" /></p>
<p>Linguists who study changes in Internet-related terminology have discovered an increasing use of ever-more-bizarre and sometimes Yiddish-sounding phrases when it comes to characterizing large quantities of digital information. As a service to Web users, VF Daily offers this handy glossary of new terms:</p>
<div id="entry-more">
<p><em>Yentabyte:</em> a thousand hectoring emails</p>
<p><em>Centayentabyte:</em> a million yentabytes</p>
<p><em>Placentabyte:</em> an overbearing mother snooping around her child’s Facebook account</p>
<p><em>Shiksabyte:</em> the Sports Illustrated Bathing Suit Issue online photo archives</p>
<p><em>Pitabyte:</em> a computer chip deliberately dipped in hummus</p>
<p><em>Wonchahavabyte:</em> an online invitation to nosh (as in: “Eat! Later, we’ll blog!”)</p>
<p><em>Cleptobyte:</em> a gigabyte of stolen data</p>
<p><em>Peptobyte:</em> a gigabyte of pink-hued antacid</p>
<p><em>Ovabyte: </em>an orthodotically challenged “Say Cheese” photo on a social networking site</p>
<p><em>Gagabyte:</em> one too many streaming videos of Lady Gaga</p>
<p><em>Yodabyte:</em> the online Star Wars database (see also: Wookiepedia)</p>
<p><em>Ferblondjibyte:</em> a gigabyte of lost data (usually occurs after forgetting to back up one’s hard drive)</p>
<p><em>Fermishtabyte:</em> a gigabyte of scrambled, meaningless data</p>
<p><em>Fercocktabyte:</em> a million fermishtabytes (also known as an ongepotchkebyte)</p>
<p><em>Shlemielabyte:</em> the noodnik who loses a fercocktabyte</p>
<p><em>Shlemazelbyte:</em> the guy the noodnik blames for making him lose the fercocktabyte</p>
<p><em>Shmaggeggebyte:</em> the tech-support guy who tries to help the noodnik find his lost fercocktabyte</p>
<p><em>Megillabyte:</em> the entire Internet</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/07/yentabytes-and-shiksabytes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballmer: Microsoft ‘Betting Our Company’ On The Cloud</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/06/ballmer-microsoft-%e2%80%98betting-our-company%e2%80%99-on-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/06/ballmer-microsoft-%e2%80%98betting-our-company%e2%80%99-on-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Joseph Tartakoff at paidContent.org:
Microsoft &#8230; is still most closely associated with its desktop software (Windows, Office etc.), but on Thursday CEO Steve Ballmer said Microsoft was “betting our company” on the cloud. About 70 percent of Microsoft employees are working on cloud-related projects right now; that figure will reach 90 percent within a year, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1642" title="cloud-s" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/03/cloud-s.jpg" alt="cloud-s" width="240" height="160" />From Joseph Tartakoff at <a href="http://paidcontent.org" target="_blank">paidContent.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft &#8230; is still most closely associated with its desktop software (Windows, Office etc.), but on Thursday CEO Steve Ballmer said Microsoft was “betting our company” on the cloud. About 70 percent of Microsoft employees are working on cloud-related projects right now; that figure will reach 90 percent within a year, he said.</p>
<p>Ballmer’s remarks—made during an address at the University of Washington—may portend a change in mission for the software giant, which for years has talked about a future of software plus web-based services. Contrast that with the tagline Microsoft is now using for its cloud efforts: “We’re all in.”</p>
<p>Lots of excitement here for Ballmer’s talk—his first ever at the school, a surprising milestone considering the university’s close ties to its Redmond neighbor. The ground floor of the atrium is packed—and people are lined up on four levels of balconies. Before Ballmer started talking, I heard one girl urge her friend to skip class with her.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-ballmer-microsoft-betting-our-company-on-the-cloud/" target="_blank">For more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/06/ballmer-microsoft-%e2%80%98betting-our-company%e2%80%99-on-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data, data everywhere: An Economist special report on managing information</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/02/data-data-everywhere-an-economist-special-report-on-managing-information/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/02/data-data-everywhere-an-economist-special-report-on-managing-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Economist print edition for 25 February 2010:

Information has gone from scarce to superabundant. That brings huge new benefits, says Kenneth Cukier (interviewed here)—but also big headaches
WHEN the Sloan Digital Sky Survey started work in 2000, its telescope in New Mexico collected more data in its first few weeks than had been amassed in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1637" title="201009srd001" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/03/201009srd001-300x168.jpg" alt="201009srd001" width="300" height="168" />From <em>The Economist</em> print edition for 25 February 2010:</p>
<blockquote>
<h2>Information has gone from scarce to superabundant. That brings huge new benefits, says Kenneth Cukier (interviewed <a title=" (opens in a new window) " href="http://audiovideo.economist.com/?fr_story=02825e89bf14288f555332a86b019387dcbd4afa&amp;rf=bm" target="_blank">here</a>)—but also big headaches</h2>
<p>WHEN the Sloan Digital Sky Survey started work in 2000, its telescope in New Mexico collected more data in its first few weeks than had been amassed in the entire history of astronomy. Now, a decade later, its archive contains a whopping 140 terabytes of information. A successor, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, due to come on stream in Chile in 2016, will acquire that quantity of data every five days.</p>
<p>Such astronomical amounts of information can be found closer to Earth too. Wal-Mart, a retail giant, handles more than 1m customer transactions every hour, feeding databases estimated at more than 2.5 petabytes—the equivalent of 167 times the books in America’s Library of Congress (see <a href="http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15557421">article</a> for an explanation of how data are quantified). Facebook, a social-networking website, is home to 40 billion photos. And decoding the human genome involves analysing 3 billion base pairs—which took ten years the first time it was done, in 2003, but can now be achieved in one week.</p>
<p>All these examples tell the same story: that the world contains an unimaginably vast amount of digital information which is getting ever vaster ever more rapidly. This makes it possible to do many things that previously could not be done: spot business trends, prevent diseases, combat crime and so on. Managed well, the data can be used to unlock new sources of economic value, provide fresh insights into science and hold governments to account.</p>
<p>But they are also creating a host of new problems. Despite the abundance of tools to capture, process and share all this information—sensors, computers, mobile phones and the like—it already exceeds the available storage space (see chart 1). Moreover, ensuring data security and protecting privacy is becoming harder as the information multiplies and is shared ever more widely around the world.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displayStory.cfm?story_id=15557443" target="_blank">For the report&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/02/data-data-everywhere-an-economist-special-report-on-managing-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of The Internet</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/01/the-state-of-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/01/the-state-of-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>audreyl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.com/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6MfnuvH4Rs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6MfnuvH4Rs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/03/01/the-state-of-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&#38;T, Verizon and Sprint 4G: Not so fast</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/23/att-verizon-and-sprint-4g-not-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/23/att-verizon-and-sprint-4g-not-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From David Goldman at CNNMoney.com:
Despite claims from mobile phone carriers, the next generation of mobile technology, or 4G, will only be slightly faster than current 3G speeds, at least initially.
Massive costs, soaring consumer demand for data and the logistical nightmare of setting up tens of thousands of new cell sites will prevent 4G technology from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1630" title="mobile_tower_dhansa-763404" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/02/mobile_tower_dhansa-763404.png" alt="mobile_tower_dhansa-763404" width="134" height="291" />From David Goldman at CNNMoney.com:</p>
<blockquote><p>Despite claims from mobile phone carriers, the next generation of mobile technology, or 4G, will only be slightly faster than current 3G speeds, at least initially.</p>
<p>Massive costs, soaring consumer demand for data and the logistical nightmare of setting up tens of thousands of new cell sites will prevent 4G technology from reaching its promised speeds for years, according to carriers and wireless experts.</p>
<p>True 4G must generate speeds of at least 100 megabits per second, according to the International Telecommunication Union. Current 3G technology offers speeds of up to 2 megabits per second and broadband delivers 5 megabits per second to the average U.S. household.</p>
<p>Faster may be better, but the road to get there will be tough. In order to fully deploy a 4G network, some carriers will have to install about 10,000 cell sites, which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars each, according to Gartner analyst Akshay Sharma.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/02/23/technology/4g_networks/" target="_blank">For the article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/23/att-verizon-and-sprint-4g-not-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of the Internet IV</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/20/the-future-of-the-internet-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/20/the-future-of-the-internet-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From Janna Anderson and Lee Rainie at www.pewinternet.org:

A survey of nearly 900 Internet stakeholders reveals fascinating new perspectives on the way the Internet is affecting human intelligence and the ways that information is being shared and rendered.
The web-based survey gathered opinions from prominent scientists, business leaders, consultants, writers and technology developers. It is the fourth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1585" title="pew-internet-iv" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/02/pew-internet-iv.jpg" alt="pew-internet-iv" width="240" height="187" /> From Janna Anderson and Lee Rainie at <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/" target="_blank">www.pewinternet.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<h3 class="first"><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;">A survey of nearly 900 Internet stakeholders reveals fascinating new perspectives on the way the Internet is affecting human intelligence and the ways that information is being shared and rendered.</span></h3>
<p>The web-based survey gathered opinions from prominent scientists, business leaders, consultants, writers and technology developers. It is the fourth in a series of Internet expert studies conducted by the Imagining the Internet Center at Elon University and the Pew Research Center’s Internet &amp; American Life Project. In this report, we cover experts&#8217; thoughts on the following issues:</p>
<ul>
<li class="first">Will Google make us stupid?</li>
<li>Will the internet enhance or detract from reading, writing, and rendering of knowledge?</li>
<li>Is the next wave of innovation in technology, gadgets, and applications pretty clear now, or will the most interesting developments between now and 2020 come “out of the blue”?</li>
<li>Will the end-to-end principle of the internet still prevail in 10 years, or will there be more control of access to information?</li>
<li class="last">Will it be possible to be anonymous online or not by the end of the decade?</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Future-of-the-Internet-IV.aspx" target="_blank">For the web page&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Future-of-the-Internet-IV.aspx?r=1" target="_blank">To view the report&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/Future%20of%20internet%202010%20-%20AAAS%20paper.pdf">To download the report in pdf format&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/20/the-future-of-the-internet-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than 75,000 computer systems hacked in one of largest cyber attacks, security firm says</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/18/more-than-75000-computer-systems-hacked-in-one-of-largest-cyber-attacks-security-firm-says/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/18/more-than-75000-computer-systems-hacked-in-one-of-largest-cyber-attacks-security-firm-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From  Ellen Nakashima in the Washington Post:
More than 75,000 computer systems at nearly 2,500 companies in the United States and around the world have been hacked in what appears to be one of the largest and most sophisticated attacks by cyber criminals discovered to date, according to a northern Virginia security firm.
The attack, which began in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1580" title="logo" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/02/logo.png" alt="logo" width="296" height="55" />From  Ellen Nakashima in the <em>Washington Post:</em></p>
<blockquote><p>More than 75,000 computer systems at nearly 2,500 companies in the United States and around the world have been hacked in what appears to be one of the largest and most sophisticated attacks by cyber criminals discovered to date, according to a northern Virginia security firm.</p>
<p>The attack, which began in late 2008 and was discovered last month, targeted proprietary corporate data, e-mails, credit-card transaction data and login credentials at companies in the health and technology industries in 196 countries, according to Herndon-based NetWitness.</p>
<p>News of the attack follows reports last month that the computer networks at Google and more than 30 other large financial, energy, defense, technology and media firms had been compromised. Google said the attack on its system originated in China.</p>
<p>This latest attack does not appear to be linked to the Google intrusion, said Amit Yoran, NetWitness&#8217;s chief executive. But it is significant, he said, in its scale and in its apparent demonstration that the criminal groups&#8217; sophistication in cyberattacks is approaching that of nation states such as China and Russia.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021705816.html?nav=rss_email/components" target="_blank">For the article&#8230;<br />
</a><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223000140" target="_blank">For an account of the attack from </a><em><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223000140" target="_blank">Information Week</a></em><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223000140" target="_blank">&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/18/more-than-75000-computer-systems-hacked-in-one-of-largest-cyber-attacks-security-firm-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Tweaks Buzz After Overblown Privacy Backlash</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/17/google-tweaks-buzz-after-overblown-privacy-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/17/google-tweaks-buzz-after-overblown-privacy-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Ryan Singel in the Wired blog Epicenter:
Google is quickly making changes to its new social networking service Buzz — built on the back of its popular Gmail service — as a complaint to federal regulators follows a populist privacy backlash over the past week.
Google admitted to rare gaff in its rollout of Buzz last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1577" title="1444417344-googlebuzzlogo68" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/02/1444417344-googlebuzzlogo68.png" alt="1444417344-googlebuzzlogo68" width="286" height="68" />From Ryan Singel in the <em>Wired</em> blog <em>Epicenter:</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Google is quickly making changes to its new social networking service Buzz — built on the back of its popular Gmail service — as a complaint to federal regulators follows a populist privacy backlash over the past week.</p>
<p>Google admitted to rare gaff in its rollout of Buzz last week, responding nimbly to a populist outcry by users who thought the social media service add-on to Gmail violated their privacy by outing who they often communicated with. A privacy group has already filed a complaint with U.S. regulators, and Canada’s privacy commissioner says she’s already looking into it.</p>
<p>But in the grand scheme of privacy invasions, this one ranks a “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Grenada">Grenada</a>” — even though it has provided some cautionary lessons — not the least of which that Google shouldn’t limit pre-release testing to its unrepresentative army of coders.</p></blockquote>
<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none; overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
<a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/02/google-tweaks-buzz/#ixzz0fotJOkfc" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/17/google-tweaks-buzz-after-overblown-privacy-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the World of Facebook</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/07/in-the-world-of-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/07/in-the-world-of-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Charles Petersen in the New York Review of Books:
Facebook, the most popular social networking Web site in the world, was founded in a Harvard dorm room in the winter of 2004. Like Microsoft, that other famous technology company started by a Harvard dropout, Facebook was not particularly original. A quarter-century earlier, Bill Gates, asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1573" title="250px-facebook_log_in1" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/02/250px-facebook_log_in1.png" alt="250px-facebook_log_in1" width="250" height="113" />From Charles Petersen in the <em>New York Review of Books</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Facebook, the most popular social networking Web site in the world, was founded in a Harvard dorm room in the winter of 2004. Like Microsoft, that other famous technology company started by a Harvard dropout, Facebook was not particularly original. A quarter-century earlier, Bill Gates, asked by IBM to provide the basic programming for its new personal computer, simply bought a program from another company and renamed it. Mark Zuckerberg, the primary founder of Facebook, who dropped out of college six months after starting the site, took most of his ideas from existing social networks such as Friendster and MySpace. But while Microsoft could as easily have originated at MIT or Caltech, it was no accident that Facebook came from Harvard.</p>
<p>What is &#8220;social networking&#8221;? For all the vagueness of the term, which now seems to encompass everything we do with other people online, it is usually associated with three basic activities: the creation of a personal Web page, or &#8220;profile,&#8221; that will serve as a surrogate home for the self; a trip to a kind of virtual agora, where, along with amusedly studying passersby, you can take a stroll through the ghost town of acquaintanceships past, looking up every person who&#8217;s crossed your path and whose name you can remember; and finally, a chance to remove the digital barrier and reveal yourself to the unsuspecting subjects of your gaze by, as we have learned to put it with the Internet&#8217;s peculiar eagerness for deforming our language, &#8220;friending&#8221; them, i.e., requesting that you be connected online in some way.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23651" target="_blank">For more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/02/07/in-the-world-of-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tending the Garden of Technology</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/01/26/tending-the-garden-of-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/01/26/tending-the-garden-of-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>audreyl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=1564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Andrew Lawler, Orion Magazine 
For Wired magazine cofounder Kevin Kelly, technology is neither the practical nor the neutral result of scientific discoveries, but a powerful universal force for creating opportunities. He speaks in unapologetically theological terms. The internet is “a miracle and a gift” that allows humans to organize and create in radically new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Andrew Lawler, <em>Orion Magazine </em></p>
<p>For <em>Wired</em> magazine cofounder Kevin Kelly, technology is neither the practical nor the neutral result of scientific discoveries, but a powerful universal force for creating opportunities. He speaks in unapologetically theological terms. The internet is “a miracle and a gift” that allows <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1565" title="phpthumb_generated_thumbnailjpg" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2010/01/phpthumb_generated_thumbnailjpg-300x204.jpg" alt="phpthumb_generated_thumbnailjpg" width="300" height="204" />humans to organize and create in radically new ways. He says that we are moving from being People of the Book to People of the Screen. Kelly’s radical pronouncements earn fire from both sides of the chasm between religion and science, even as he seeks to see beyond those dogmas. Today he wants to “talk about faith using the vocabulary and logic of science.” When I arrive at Kelly’s home south of San Francisco, he’s sweaty from riding his bike up the steep hill, which rises from the coast. Poet, wanderer, publisher, cross-country bicyclist, former hippie, and self-described nerd, Kelly’s trimmed white beard is that of a New England clipper-ship captain. His home office is perched in a wooded neighborhood and has the pleasant feel of a lived-in tree house, the floor strewn with books and papers and gadgets.</p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/5227" target="_blank">To Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/01/26/tending-the-garden-of-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
