Monthly Archive for March, 2011

Paul Baran, Internet Pioneer, Dies at 84

The engineer Paul Baran.

Charles Dharapak/Associated Press

From Kate Hafner in The New York Times:

Paul Baran, an engineer who helped create the technical underpinnings for the Arpanet, the government-sponsored precursor to today’s Internet, died Saturday night at his home in Palo Alto, Calif. He was 84.

The cause was complications from lung cancer, said his son, David.

In the early 1960s, while working at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, Calif., Mr. Baran outlined the fundamentals for packaging data into discrete bundles, which he called “message blocks.” The bundles are then sent on various paths around a network and reassembled at their destination. Such a plan is known as “packet switching.”

With British scientist Donald Davies and many others, Baran devised the packet-switching technology that is the basis of the modern Internet, thereby helping to bring into being J.C.R. Licklider’s “galactic network”.

For more…

Low-Power Memory from Nanotubes

?From Katherine Bourzac in Technology Review:

A new type of nonvolatile memory based on carbon nanotubes has dramatically lower power requirements than current technology. It uses the nanotubes to read and write data to small islands of phase-change materials, which store information. With further development, the new technology could extend battery life in mobile devices and also make desktop computers more efficient.

Nonvolatile memory stores information even when the power is switched off. The standard technology for it, flash memory, is used in smart phones, cameras, USB sticks, and fast-booting netbook computers. But the storage density of flash memory is reaching its limit because the transistors used to make flash memory arrays cannot be miniaturized any further. The power needed to write to flash is also a speed limitation, and it drains the batteries in portable devices.

Ubiquitous computing was predicted in the 1990s and is well toward coming to pass. Super-low-power memory will bring it even closer. The environmental impact of the manufacture and ultimate disposal of carbon nanotube memory units remains to be measured.

For more…

Professor gets computing’s ‘Nobel’: Harvard’s Leslie Valiant wins A.M. Turing Award

From Calvin Hennick in the Boston Globe:

Harvard University professor Leslie G. Valiant, a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence, has been awarded the 2010 A.M. Turing Award, the most prestigious prize in the field of computer science. Valiant’s research into processes to make computers reason as humans do laid the groundwork for applications ranging from e-mail spam filters to IBM’s Watson computer system, which last month bested human competitors on the game show “Jeopardy!’’

Artificial intelligence’s original promise was not fulfilled with the speed expected by its early researchers. Skeptical philosophers attacked the very idea of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, research has continued, and is bearing fruit.

For the Globe article…

For the ACM press release…

U. of I.’s Literacy Software Could Make No Child Left Behind Exams ‘History’

From The University of Illinois News Bureau

While social media such as Facebook and Twitter have transformed the way people communicate, educational practices haven’t kept pace, relying on outdated, limited tools such as standardized tests that don’t reflect the profound changes precipitated by the Web. An interdisciplinary team of experts at the University of Illinois is developing software that they believe will transform the practice of writing assessment – and potentially eliminate cumbersome proficiency testing such as that mandated by state and federal agencies as a result of the No Child Left Behind Act.

The software, called “u-author” – the “u” for “ubiquitous,” available anywhere, anytime on any Web-enabled device – embeds the practice of writing in a social media environment that promotes complex learning and interaction among peers.

The software provides a writing space in which students’ compositions become portals for evaluating their progress in language arts and science. State standards and teachers’ assessment rubrics can be integrated into it, furnishing immediate data on users’ learning and eliminating the need for end-of-program exams and proficiency tests, according to Bill Cope, a professor of education policy, organization and leadership in the College of Education at Illinois who is leading the project team.

To Read More…

Print me a Stradivarius

From The Economist

The industrial revolution of the late 18th century made possible the mass production of goods, thereby creating economies of scale which changed the economy—and society—in ways that nobody could have imagined at the time. Now a new manufacturing technology has emerged which does the opposite. Three-dimensional printing makes it as cheap to create single items as it is to produce thousands and thus undermines economies of scale. It may have as profound an impact on the world as the coming of the factory did.

It works like this. First you call up a blueprint on your computer screen and tinker with its shape and colour where necessary. Then you press print. A machine nearby whirrs into life and builds up the object gradually, either by depositing material from a nozzle, or by selectively solidifying a thin layer of plastic or metal dust using tiny drops of glue or a tightly focused beam. Products are thus built up by progressively adding material, one layer at a time: hence the technology’s other name, additive manufacturing. Eventually the object in question—a spare part for your car, a lampshade, a violin—pops out. The beauty of the technology is that it does not need to happen in a factory. Small items can be made by a machine like a desktop printer, in the corner of an office, a shop or even a house; big items—bicycle frames, panels for cars, aircraft parts—need a larger machine, and a bit more space.

To Read More…

Review: Reopening the Space Frontier

John Faust in The Space Review:

One of the most pervasive—and disappointing—metaphors associated with space exploration is that of the frontier. It’s pervasive in that it’s hard to escape the concept, at least in the United States, that space is a frontier to be pioneered, an idea that has found root in everything from the names of organizations (the Space Frontier Foundation) to one of the most famous opening lines of a television show (“Space: the final frontier” of Star Trek fame). Even this publication references that “final frontier” meme when it comes to spaceflight. But the concept of space as a frontier, final or otherwise, is also disappointing to many in that, nearly 50 years after the first humans ventured into space, we have done little to open that frontier as a place where people can live and work. After a burst of activity in the early years of the Space Age, culminating with the Apollo lunar landings, human activity in space has been literally going in circles, confined to Earth orbit, as proposals for exploration beyond have time and again fallen by the wayside. Why that might be the case, and what can be done to change is, is the subject of a provocative new book by John Hickman, Reopening the Space Frontier.

Read the full review here.

Reopening the Space Frontier by John Hickman is now available from theTechnology and Society imprint.