<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techandsoc.com &#187; 2010 &#187; May &#187; 25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techandsoc.com/2010/05/25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techandsoc.com</link>
	<description>An international CONFERENCE, a scholarly JOURNAL, a BOOK series, and an online KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sure, It’s Big. But Is That Bad?</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2010/05/25/sure-it%e2%80%99s-big-but-is-that-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2010/05/25/sure-it%e2%80%99s-big-but-is-that-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>audreyl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.com/?p=1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Brad Stone, The New York Times In the 1990s, Gary Reback, a Silicon Valley lawyer, almost single-handedly brought the antitrust weight of the federal government down on that era’s high-tech heavyweight, Microsoft. Now Mr. Reback contends there is a dangerous new monopolist in the catbird seat: the search giant Google. This month, Mr. Reback [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Brad Stone, <em>The New York Times</em></p>
<blockquote><p>In the 1990s, Gary Reback, a Silicon Valley lawyer, almost single-handedly brought the antitrust weight of the federal government down on that era’s high-tech heavyweight, <span class="meta-org">Microsoft</span>. Now Mr. Reback contends there is a dangerous new monopolist in the catbird seat: the search giant <span class="meta-org">Goo</span><span class="meta-org">g</span><span class="meta-org">le</span>.</p>
<p>This month, Mr. Reback shepherded Adam and Shivaun Raff, the husband-and-wife entrepreneurs behind the London comparison shopping site Foundem, around Washington. The three held meetings with Congressional staff members and antitrust enforcers at the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.</p>
<p>Their goal was to air the Foundem couple’s complaint that in 2006, Google’s supposedly objective algorithms suddenly dropped Foundem into the netherworld of Google search results. They say Google also raised the rates Foundem had to pay to advertise alongside search results. These moves, the couple say, pushed their comparison shopping site out of view, and Google later put the spotlight on its own shopping listings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/technology/23goog.html?hpw" target="_blank">To Read More&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2010/05/25/sure-it%e2%80%99s-big-but-is-that-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

