<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techandsoc.com &#187; 2009 &#187; December &#187; 18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techandsoc.com/2009/12/18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techandsoc.com</link>
	<description>An international CONFERENCE, a scholarly JOURNAL, a BOOK series, and an online KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Look Who&#8217;s Talking: The Turing Test&#8217;s 3,000 Year History &#8211; And My Proposed Modification</title>
		<link>http://techandsoc.com/2009/12/18/look-whos-talking-the-turing-tests-3000-year-history-and-my-proposed-modification/</link>
		<comments>http://techandsoc.com/2009/12/18/look-whos-talking-the-turing-tests-3000-year-history-and-my-proposed-modification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>audreyl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techandsoc.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Richard Eskow, 3 Quarks Daily. In his famous experiment, Alan Turing pictured somebody talking with another person and a computer, both of which are out of sight.  If they&#8217;re unable to tell the computer from the human being, the machine has passed the &#8220;Turing Test.&#8221;  But here&#8217;s a question for a human or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Richard Eskow, <em>3 Quarks Daily.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>In his famous experiment, Alan Turing pictured somebody talking with another person and a computer, both of which are out of sight.  If they&#8217;re unable to tell the computer from the human being, the machine has passed the &#8220;Turing Test.&#8221;  But here&#8217;s a question for a human <em>or </em>a machine to answer:  Why did Turing pick <em>speech </em>as his proof?  <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1528" title="6a00d8341c562c53ef0128765060e9970c-300wi" src="http://techandsoc.com/files/2009/12/6a00d8341c562c53ef0128765060e9970c-300wi.jpg" alt="6a00d8341c562c53ef0128765060e9970c-300wi" width="300" height="243" /></p>
<p>The Test is usually described as way to determine whether a computer has achieved consciousness, but Turing&#8217;s original framing was more subtle.  &#8220;I believe (the question of whether machines can think) to be too meaningless to deserve discussion,&#8221; he wrote.  &#8220;Nevertheless I believe that at the end of the century the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that <em>one will be able to speak of machines  thinking</em> without expecting to be contradicted.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/12/look-whos-talking-the-turing-tests-3000-year-history.html" target="_blank">To Read More&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techandsoc.com/2009/12/18/look-whos-talking-the-turing-tests-3000-year-history-and-my-proposed-modification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

